
White Queen Takes Black Knight
When White Men on the Chessboard Get Up and Tell You How to Vote
Some Election Speculation by Clyde Lewis
May 6, 2008
In my Ground Zero Lounge programs I have tried to bring subjects up that deal with the economy and the reports of resource depletion for a long time. The unfortunate thing is that I have also seen many of my shows devolve into racial arguments and the blame game.
Politics are once again becoming volatile. No matter how much I warn my audience of the trap that is being set by the Obama/Clinton chess game, I am immediately told that I must be a fascist who wants to see McCain keep us in a hundred years war in the Middle East.
I have focused much of my attention on Barack Obama and not on Hillary Clinton because in the past I have written about the Clintons and nobody wanted to hear about the skeletons in their closets. I was attacked by liberals at the time. I then focused my attentions on the Bush administration being bad for America, and of course I was criticized by conservatives for being too liberal.
I can't fight people who can only think black and white but my record speaks for itself. I just have to urge people in this attention deficit democracy to look up what I have written in the past. My attacks are not against specific politicians so much as against bad politics in general, against how we are all pawns on the chess board, subject to bigger bishops, kings, queens, and rooks that are moving according to plan.
There is something creepy about the movements of the chess pieces in today's game. Religious and political figures move about in their own divisive ways and we see how religion and politics make for a game that might be easily predicted or figured out by those who are watching the witchy ways of he elite.
I recently laughed out loud when I was reading an article about McCain's oft-discussed superstitions. Most notably, he has a fear of numbers. Many astrologists share a concern about his campaign expressed in zodiac signs and planet alignments.
I myself have pointed out these very "concerns" during Ground Zero lounge presentations. While I do not necessarily follow my moon in whatever house, or which planet sits in whichever realm, I do read what others have to say, and in many instances I see that perhaps the planets do in fact rule us, and perhaps, as they move about the game board, so goes politics and religion.
The movements of our leaders, our self-appointed gods and saviors, seem to also affect our environment although there is nothing to prove it. All we have is synchronistic mysticism, and even then magical thinking leads to psychosis.
Take for example the movements of the Bishop of Rome. Before his visit to the United States, the Pope baptized a Muslim during the Easter season in the name of the "Father, Son and Holy Ghost." Muslim leaders are still angry over the Pope and his so-called hatred of their faith.
This sent shockwaves over the world and the Pope's visit became a security risk as the cloud of assassination drifted over him. The thought of his death had been uttered before, especially when he traveled to Turkey. Undaunted, the Pope walked into the virtual Muslim lion's den unscathed. Even though there had been dire predictions given about his safety, he left Turkey unharmed.
When the Pope arrived in the United States, it seemed to be a bit odd that a dignitary of such great religious influence had arrived at a time that preceded the pagan holiday of Beltane. Around the same time the year before, it had been the Queen of England who arrived in the States to visit Virginia. Afterwards there were fires and storms all over the United States.
After the Pope's arrival a storm of earthquakes plagued the United States, and after he left, wildfires ignited and a score of tornadoes ravaged Virginia and Arkansas.
Perhaps there is a method to the movements of dignitaries. They might be literal chess pieces that move from station to station, all things in the environment affected as they pass.
This is highly speculative, but it is a very significant pattern to consider. Could the immediate circle of influence of our human chess pieces spread like ripples, similar to those a stone creates as it is tossed into a pond?
Another example of strangeness comes from the United Kingdom and Prince William, another playing piece on the chessboard of significant influence.
In a Ceremony held on St. George's Day, the Queen of England made William the 1,000th Knight of the Garter in the 660th anniversary of Britain's oldest order of chivalry, which was founded in 1348 by King Edward III.
Now what is truly odd is that in the strict order of knights, William appears as number 999. That is because the uncounted founder was Edward the III. So as the 999th knight the numbers seem to be easily manipulated to demonstrate some awkward numerology.
999 inverted is 666; in 6 years during the 666th anniversary of the Garter it would be most interesting if William were made King. This would make him approximately 33 years of age. In the year 2015 it has been proposed that he will be the King of England by many who believe the William could very well be the Antichrist. The number 33 is also a sacred number in secret societies and many believe it is because Christ was put to death in his 33rd year.
Numbers are always fun to manipulate. Some people believe in mystical mathematics and calculated moves seem to give those in power the chaotic results they are seeking.
It seems to be quite apparent that as these chess pieces move, we the pawns are disturbed as well. The spirit of the people is beginning to dwindle. It is as if they are being held in some sort of trance and are beginning to feel a bit at odds with their own common sense.
A lot of conspiracy watchers will tell you that politicians, Popes, Queens, Princes, or priests base all of their movements on the promptings of the beast.
The Black Knight approaches to the board and the White Queen meet at odds with the realm. The pawns all gather and battle to the intellectual death, and the witch hunts begin when one sees beyond the game and points out how the battle has all been staged and the color of the one may not be desirable to the other and so on.
So goes the political battle of the democratic fortress and the thrones of candidates in this country.
Too many Americans are mesmerized by Barack Obama saying that he is better than Clinton and McCain. But we all know the skeletons in the closets of those two candidates, because they have been in the public eye for so long.
Once again, a form of witchery is being used to lead people in the direction of Obama and no one can see beyond the spell.
As a former Mormon, I have seen the rise of group dynamic mind wash and how, with its intentions, it tends to reduce a human to monkey meat. Mormonism is not evil by any stretch of the imagination, but a lot of its tactics for recruitment and membership involve compliance, and a punishment-reward system for participation.
The Mormons have a book which is their doctrine. They also surround themselves around a charismatic prophet who by bloodline is ordained as the leader and literal Jesus Christ on earth .
Now what I am about to tell you all is really nothing new if you have paid attention to the political arena.
I have stated that Barack Obama's presidential campaign is a cult and that there are several ways to prove that what is being used to get people to pay attention to him are strategic pictures, key phrases, control phrases, like "Change" and "Believe."
Obama's biggest supporter is Oprah Winfrey and with a little witchiness from some New Age hocus-pocus the whole scariness comes into view.
Please be aware of what is happening around the messianic candidate. On March 17th 2008 Oprah Winfrey along with New Age writer Eckhart Tolle lead 300,000 people in a trance of silence on her show. Toley's Book A New Earth is a New Age book that actually teaches a form of pantheism. Now nearly 2 million people are participating in what appears to be a harmless affair.
But some people aren't so happy with this.
Christ Identifiers are beginning to take offense to Oprah and Tolle's philosophy because it rejects Jesus Christ as savior and son of God. Oprah calls this a movement for change in thought for the New World.
Every Monday evening there is an online meeting of hundreds of thousands of people who read from Tolle's "gospel" and some of the techniques that are being used in her online classes have been compared with brainwashing techniques.
When studying MKULTRA mind control tactics, you find certain techniques in which puppet masters do a form of thought break or cessation therapy where the subject is asked to focus upon a target image like a rabbit or a flower.
Some well-known techniques in brainwashing are thought-stopping and meditation, techniques that cause the mind to go "flat." These are altered-state-of-consciousness techniques that initially induce calm by giving the mind something simple to deal with and focusing awareness. The continued use brings on a feeling of elation and eventually hallucination.
The result is the reduction of thought and, eventually, if used long enough, the cessation of all thought, with withdrawal from everyone and everything except that which the controllers direct. The takeover is then complete.
There are also repetition techniques where chanting of words and phrases become seared into the mind. Certain music scales and word phrases are known as control words and there are only certain people who can awaken the person under control with something known as "The Voice of God."
Oprah opens the online service (class) with these words: "I thank you, Eckhart Tolle thanks you for joining us as we bring students and seekers together to discuss our latest book club selection, Eckhart Tolle's A New Earth. I welcome you to the awakening, the shift in consciousness that's happening all over the planet."
At a UCLA Obama rally, Stevie Wonder led a group of people in a singsong chant using the musical scale and sang 'Bah ha rack Oh bah huh hah maaah", up and back down again. That was creepy-- and we all have heard now that Obama has a pretty impressive bloodline. He is related to Dick Cheney, and George Bush is his eleventh cousin.
That's because they share the same great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents -- Samuel Hinckley and Sarah Soole Hinckley of 17th- century Massachusetts. I am often told that bloodlines and associations really don't matter.
(I know that I have a better Bacon Number than he does, but that doesn't count in politics. Yet. )
Like it or not, associations do matter in political circles. His blood link to the other leaders and his association with Oprah doesn't keep him from being above suspicion.
We have Oprah Winfrey, an influential woman, pushing a New Age Guru with a new "bible" and supporting a messianic leader, Barack Obama. Every Monday she holds an online brainwashing session saying that she is trying to awaken people. She was in attendance at UCLA when Stevie wonder conducted a singing of the scale and chanting Barack Obama's name asking "Is he the One?"
All over the Internet and in magazines we have pictures depicting Obama with halos and lights of divinity and a group of brainwashed followers falling to their knees, crying, fainting and calling him the new JFK, MLK and even Jesus Christ himself.
Is this right? Don't you feel a bit weird about what is transpiring?
That is not all. Not by a long shot.
Another staunch supporter of Barack Obama and close associate of Oprah Winfrey is Marianne Williamson. Williamson is featured on XM radio's Oprah and Friends. She is also responsible for re-igniting interest in the New Age book "A Course in Miracles" with her book "A Return to Love: Reflections on the Principles of A Course in Miracles." Williamson's career was launched by Oprah, and Williamson has said that much of her philosophies come from "A Course in Miracles."
"A Course in Miracles" has been called "The Course" and "ACIM" for short and was allegedly channeled by Helen Shuchman and written by William (Bill) Thetford. Thetford claims that he "scribed" the book by means of a process coming from a divine source through a form which Shuchman referred to as "inner dictation". Shuchman said the source of her channeling was Jesus Christ.
The secret behind "The Course" is that much of the funding of the book came from the CIA's MK Ultra program. The purpose of the funding was to explore human personality.
Shuchman claimed that the entire work was dictated to her by an audible voice. She eventually said that the voice was Jesus himself. Dr. William Thetford headed the CIA's "Mind Control" MK-ULTRA SubProject 130: Personality Theory, while at Columbia University between 1971-1978.
The CIA MKULTRA program was created in the 1950s to learn ways to manipulate people's mental states, alter brain function and create Manchurian Candidates often through the use of drugs and hypnosis. Many conspiracy theorists have suggested that there have been many possible "sleepers" who have been used to terrorize Americans. A few that have been named include Charles Manson, David "Son of Sam" Berkowitz, RFK assassin Sirhan Sirhan, and Heaven's Gate Cult leader Marshall Applewhite.
Many people who knew Thetford claim that he was atheistic and sinister and that Shuchman was a Jewish intellectual who often stated that she, too. was an atheist. The staff at Columbia were unaware that Thetford worked for the CIA in such a capacity. People influenced by "The Course" don't seem to care about the CIA connections. Many say that it has changed their lives.
Thetford's work in the CIA was classified but not limited to creating "sleepers" by causing amnesic barriers. He would split in two the old personality of the person and give birth to new hidden personality by implanting hypnotic codes and triggers so that the person being manipulated would never understand his role.
If I say the word "Change" who do you think of now? If I say "Change you can believe in" who can bring that change? It is automatic, isn't it?
The programming is stronger than the reality.
Could it be that people like Oprah Winfrey and Marianne Williamson are getting millions of people to "flatten" their thought processes so that they can insert programmed thoughts or key phrases? Then as the programming progresses trust is gained and more programming is given until we are hypnotically accepting a cult like dynamic for Obama? They are using all of the techniques mentioned in these "progressive" books. Williamson doesn't want to stop with the guidelines of "the course" remaining on her radio show and books. She is now involved in the lobbying effort to establish a Cabinet-level Department of Peace. Dennis Kucinich first proposed this, but now it has become an important issue for activists in The Peace Alliance headed by Williamson.
While the idea sounds praiseworthy, it also sounds very Orwellian to a lot of other people. Imagine having a department that officiates over harmonizing the world through a series of programs designed to keep you at peace and have you open for all kinds of "programming" so that certain trigger phrases and action words click a cog wheel in the brain for "flat think" so that it will not affect you.
It looks as if whatever programming is going on, Obama seems to say all of the right things and make all of the sweet proposals without being challenged or criticized. Obama can speak like a real hypocrite and it somehow is magically brilliant parlance to most of the entranced America.
For example I want to go way back to the Reverend Wright event where Obama felt that he had to do damage control about racism with his "More perfect Union Speech." Obama stated in his speech:
"But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union."
Weeks later he shows up in Portland, Oregon, with Bill Richardson in tow. He is, of course, Latino, and it was shocking to see him break his ties with the Clintons to support the Obama campaign. The media was a buzz with the news that support of Richardson could sway the "Latino" vote.
Oh no, this is not about race.
Barack Obama wants to move beyond a race-centric campaign and yet we see this. Racism is fine, I guess, as long as it is approved racism.
Racism that will help his campaign.
The Latino vote is vital. Because we all know that the Latinos have been at odds with blacks for some time.
The scary part is that it seems that no one sees the hypocrisy because Obama says it with such inspiring word salad. It is all words, words have to be guarded or you will be hunted down and excoriated by the media.
His whole campaign is divisive.
It is a psy-op campaign for racial division and turmoil and will fuel the fires of a racial witch hunt in which everyone will eventually be tagged with a racial mark and soon everyone will be under suspicion.
The Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act was first proposed by Democrats in 2007. It cleared the House with more than 400 representatives voting in favor of a bill that will fight those who are considered "radicals" with ideologies that are not "acceptable" in the United States. This bill that is destined to become law is the very "thought crime" legislation that Big Brother is hoping for.
The passing of the bill will give the government the ability to distribute money to two new bodies: a "National Commission" and a "Center of Excellence," both dedicated to the study of ideologically based violence. Together, they will report on the roots of radical thought and propose legislation to intercept violent acts.
Sounds like the foundation for this Department of Peace proposal.
Think about it: if you have any ideologies that seem to be out of synch with the majority, you could be placed in a program to cleanse you of all of your impure thoughts. So if you are suspected of being an anti-Semite or a racist, you may have to get treatment or be jailed or both.
I have even been called a racist for not supporting Obama. This is very bad form. It is also a very easy thing to do behind the veil of a computer screen or blog to poke at someone without knowing their intent or even their thoughts.
Thoughts are funny things, really.
I love how if I claim I can read your thoughts I would be considered crazy and that it could be considered a symptom of "magical thinking" - the belief that one possesses the magical ability to affect the actions of others, or even be omnipotent or omniscient.
Interesting, do we see Orwellian themes taking shape now?
Thought crime, and ideologies that are not held by the power elite, will be taken to task and punished I am sure that this punishment will be a lot worse than death. How dark is the mysticism surrounding the accuracy of mental reading and analyzing?
Could it be that this is all a classical setup, and that the game has already been played over and over? Do the organizers of the game know how the pawns will move? Could it be that what is happening -- that every hatred we have ever buried is being brought to the surface now by manipulation and spell casting?
There is that magical thinking again.
It is also magical thinking to assume that it's going to be a successful task for Barack Obama to run a post- racial government when we all know that racial biases still exist. As people try to bury them they magically come to the surface, and they aren't always acknowledged or understood at a conscious level; sometimes this brings us to the point of civil uprising.
Could a civil war repeat itself? With racism, poverty, higher gas prices and all sorts of other crises tugging at us, we could easily see the United States slipping further into the grasp of a clash of civilizations.
Wouldn't that be the darkest irony?
It is also, from a skeptical view, "impossible", because no one could fathom why those in power or "they", those that rule the system, would let things go to those kinds of extremes.
Is there truly a benefit to unleashing a despotic government arm in the United States today?
Of course there is. All weapons and tools of control are the best resources your tax dollars have purchased. The games we play are bought and paid for and the outcomes have been practiced over and over again.
There are many people who believe that they will never be in the cross hairs of a police agency or militarized police state; they have the false sense that they are without sin because they pay their taxes and avoid breaking laws.
However, when new laws are made and a bourgeois democracy is in play, people will not take the time to understand that they have all become criminals to a certain extent and that no one is above suspicion. A perfect example of this was directly after 9/11 where constitutional laws were revoked for some trumped-up danger. People honestly thought that they were targets, even though many of them died or will die in typical natural ways.
But who influenced this conflict of common sense? The answer is those who are in the position of having deep pockets to influence and program you into a "victim" mentality. They are the same people who are programming you into believing that a savior awaits. That change would be a quick fix, not a gradual process.
When Hillary Clinton won the Pennsylvania primary, I knew what was happening. It his me Immediately that this is a matter of White Queen vs. Black Knight strategy that I am sure many people will deny, but it is obvious that "establishment politics" have kept this game at a sickening level.
The do-or-die attitude of the Clinton campaign is a strong indicator of establishment politics and how the "normal" American is led to believe certain things about the election that I always tell people are myth. But of course, I am the unpopular jerk at election time because I have figured out the process of "establishment politics" and the chess game they have devised to set the trap for us pawns who only know how to die to protect the process.
An Obama supporter told me that Hillary would lose Pennsylvania. I told him that what I saw was another "against-all-odds" victory for Hillary in the works to keep the establishment political engine running.
Of course I was correct. It is not because I am smart or psychic; I am just cynical, and I see that we are once again in the mindset that this election is the most important one of our lives.
Just like the last one, in which I predicted a Bush victory and a Kerry betrayal of his party.
It happened the way I said it would, and I actually held a Ground Zero Lounge trying to ease the pain of Democratic loss by encouraging my liberal listeners to be prepared to be good "losers."
I may have to do this again with Obama. If I am wrong I will welcome it -- but establishment politics bring me back to the idea that no matter how bad it gets, Hillary is going to succeed.
Obama's success comes with no real challenge. How do we challenge the Black Knight when he is here to save us? How can we be critical of the Black Knight when to do so can appear to be insensitive and racist?
My God, is Barack Obama beyond the scope of critique? Isn't it liberating to say that all politicians are incompetent and shallow? That they do not share our morality, and for them to posture themselves as saviors is the true refuge of a scoundrel?
We have been distracted by our fear, our victimization, so it is wise to stop the game now. The mush that is a poor excuse for the American mind was somehow triggered and programmed by the Obama charm during the television writer's strike.
Somehow in all of the re-runs of late night talk shows and reality shows, Obama became a rock star and after the strike was over things changed.
No writers were there to roast the new candidate and all we heard were old jokes about old scandals with all of the good old favorites from Bush to Chaney to Hillary and McCain.
But nothing bad about Obama.
After the strike Saturday Night Live became relevant again because they demonstrated the hypocrisy of the nightly news fawning all over Obama and making him look like political celebrity. Obama has lucked out in the popularity contest, but he loses in the establishment politics chess game; it seems that white men on the chess board will always get up and tell you how to vote.
This presidential campaign soap opera makes for some great theatrics-- but I have been involved with too many movies and theater productions not to know that I am being "had."
As much as people want to discredit Rush Limbaugh, he often speaks the truth; you just have to dig away at tons of excretory material before revealing the truth about establishment politics.
Limbaugh has said that the Democratic Party always has been and still is buttressed by a good-ole-white-boy network and that most of the Super Delegates are white, and that even if Obama wins the popular vote, the establishment politics would throw their votes to Hillary -- and she knows it; that is why she has not bowed out.
She has no reason to. She knows who her friends are in Washington, and they know what policies she will endorse and what they can give her to make it appear as though she is a wounded candidate.
It is all drama -- it is all acting -- and people are all falling for it again.
Before anyone accuses me of being a McCain supporter or Hillary dupe -- I need to expose how the establishment politics work. It is simple:
It's been established that the Founders did not trust the people to make the right decision about the presidency and thus created a "filtering system" to remove the people from the election. This is the electoral college.
It is here to protect the two-party system. It ensures that either a Republican or a Democrat will be elected president. The "establishment political system" is in place so that the same policies and general practices of war will continue, and that no matter who is in office, what will take place is business as usual. No one in politics has asked that the Electoral College or the establishment system be abolished. Here are some quotes to show how times really don't change and that our founding fathers based their politics in cynicism rather than hope:
A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine. Thomas Jefferson
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! --Benjamin Franklin, 1759
The White Queen is about to take the Black Knight if she so chooses to play the dirty trick. Yes, the Clintons have always had dirty tricks up their sleeves and should not be underestimated.
I am about to speculate on how Clinton could win this whole thing and take the Black Knight down. While I am not a great chess player, I am a good guesser, so take this for what it is: speculation.
Hillary Clinton will make her move during the North Carolina primary where she will most definitely lose.
It has been said that this is an obvious outcome because of the Black vote going to Obama.
Once again the Queen, wounded, will heal and say that she will not give up. However, the nation will have to see the truth for what the North Carolina win for Obama will show, the paranoia that the race is not about man or woman but about color of skin. The message will be clear and it might ignite a white storm of controversy which will fuel the already simmering racial tensions in the United States.
Hillary can afford to lose North Carolina, because the echo of the loss will send a message to white voters. Hillary will, however, have to somehow appeal to black voters by doing something bold to win sympathy from the minority voters. There needs to be a racial crisis that only she can tame and bring the rest of black America to her side.
Luckily there is one brewing in her home state of New York.
The Sean Bell shooting incident took place in Queens, New York in 2006. Bell, an unarmed black man was at his bachelor party when he was shot and killed. Two other men in his party were wounded by NYPD detectives who were in plain clothes. Two of the officers were also black. Police shot 50 bullets. The officers were recently exonerated, which sent a troubling message to the black community in Queens. While people have argued that this is not a racial issue, the Reverend Al Sharpton has kept the resentment fueled and a racial powder keg is now being kept with a short fuse.
Something could eventually explode.
This could be an opportunity for Hillary to defuse the situation.
If she feels she needs to.
There are also other possible triggers that would create a crisis before the election in November. Anything from terror attacks in a major U. S. city like Chicago, Obama's territory, or even an assassination attempt on one of the candidates. The latter seems to be the most popular allegory going through conspiracy theory circles and websites.
My conclusion goes back to the numbers: Hillary's numbers are better then Barack Obama's.
The real test is in how the "programming" that was allowed to slip into the Democratic fight will trigger "sleepers" to react when Obama loses.
Will they rebel? Will they riot? That is all darker than I can even predict. When the White Queen takes down the Black Knight, someone may take the entire game and throw it against the wall, shattering all that we have fought and suffered for.
Always remember: ashes and diamonds, foe and friend, we are all equal in the end.